From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1929
170 N.E. 127 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued October 2, 1929

Decided October 22, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Everett F. Warrington, Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., and Robert H. Woody for appellants.

Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondents.


Order reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board in this court and Appellate Division, on the authority of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc. ( 242 N.Y. 497); no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ. Dissenting: CRANE and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 22, 1929
170 N.E. 127 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

Matter of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARTIN FINKELSTEIN, Respondent, against NEW…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 22, 1929

Citations

170 N.E. 127 (N.Y. 1929)
170 N.E. 127

Citing Cases

Zurich G.A. L. Ins. Co. v. Childs Co.

This was done by the insurance carrier, acting as the employer's representative, upon report of Bellville's…

United States Trucking Corp. v. New York & Pennsylvania Motor Express, Inc.

This was done by the insurance carrier, acting as the employer's representative, upon report of Bellville's…