From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Farid v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 1995
217 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Torraca, J.).


Petitioner challenges his denial of parole release and Supreme Court's dismissal of his petition challenging the denial due to bias and on the additional ground that the decision was irrational.

Petitioner is serving time for a conviction for manslaughter in the first degree in the fatal shooting of a victim during the course of a brawl and for attempted murder in the first degree, stemming from the same incident, when defendant shot at a police officer who was attempting to apprehend him. The denial of petitioner's request for parole release was based on the gravity of the offenses and petitioner's other criminal behavior dating back to 1966, which includes several misdemeanor convictions and two prior felony convictions.

We find no reason to overturn respondents' determination. Petitioner's allegations of bias and irrationality are not supported by the record. The determination was made in conformity with statutory requirements and is therefore not reviewable ( see, Executive Law § 259-i; Matter of Hall v. New York State Executive Dept., 188 A.D.2d 791).

Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Farid v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 1995
217 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Farid v. Russi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MUJAHID FARID, Appellant, v. RAUL RUSSI, as Chairman of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 20, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

In Matter of Farid v. Evans

All three parole commissioners concurred in the denial determination which reads as follows: At least three…

Farid v. Ellen

This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over these state claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367. Plaintiff is no…