From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of F. Co. v. B S Mach. Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jun 18, 1964
43 Misc. 2d 821 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)

Opinion

June 18, 1964

Mullooly, Mullen Jeffrey ( Bernard Jeffrey of counsel), for petitioner.

Bernard Rothfeld for Rowe AC Services.


This is a special proceeding by a judgment creditor for an order directing the Meadow Brook National Bank, as garnishee, to pay over money on deposit to the credit of the judgment debtor. The application is resisted by a competing judgment creditor who asserts priority to the fund by reason of having served a restraining notice on the bank.

Subdivision (a) of 5202 CPLR provides that once the judgment creditor has delivered an execution to the Sheriff, his rights in a debt owed to the judgment debtor or in an interest of the judgment debtor in personal property against which debt or property the judgment may be enforced, are superior to the extent of the amount of the execution to the rights of any transferee of the debt or property, with two exceptions. These are, firstly, where the transferee acquired the debt or property for fair consideration before it was levied upon; or secondly, where the transferee acquired a debt or personal property not capable of delivery for fair consideration after it was levied upon and without knowledge of the levy. The resisting judgment creditor served a restraining notice pursuant to 5222 CPLR. Thereby, the bank was "forbidden to make or suffer any sale, assignment or transfer of, or any interference with, any such property or pay over or otherwise dispose of any such debt, to any person other than the sheriff, except upon direction of the sheriff or pursuant to an order of the court". (CPLR 5222, subd. [b].)

Clearly, therefore, the rights of the petitioner, which has issued an execution to the Sheriff of Nassau County, cannot be defeated by the prior issuance of a restraining notice. No lien is gained by the service of a restraining notice. The creditor who issues execution on his judgment is entitled to priority over nonexecuting creditors unless they have obtained an order for the delivery or payment of a debt owed to the judgment debtor or have secured the appointment of a receiver. The petition is granted.


Summaries of

Matter of F. Co. v. B S Mach. Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jun 18, 1964
43 Misc. 2d 821 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of F. Co. v. B S Mach. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH H. FISHER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. BAR SPA…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Jun 18, 1964

Citations

43 Misc. 2d 821 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)
252 N.Y.S.2d 390

Citing Cases

City of New York v. Panzirer

The restraining notices serve the purpose of preventing the third person or garnishee from surrendering the…