From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Escobar v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

In Matter of Escobar v Roberts (29 N.Y.2d 594, mot to amend remittitur granted 29 N.Y.2d 709), this Court first considered the issue, and reached the same conclusion as the courts cited above.

Summary of this case from People v. Vasquez

Opinion

Argued June 9, 1971

Decided July 7, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Joseph A. Kaplan and Robert Kasanof for appellant.

Burton B. Roberts, District Attorney ( Bennett M. Epstein of counsel), respondent, pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Robert S. Hammer and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for Justices of Supreme Court, Bronx County, respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Matter of Escobar v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1971)

In Matter of Escobar v Roberts (29 N.Y.2d 594, mot to amend remittitur granted 29 N.Y.2d 709), this Court first considered the issue, and reached the same conclusion as the courts cited above.

Summary of this case from People v. Vasquez
Case details for

Matter of Escobar v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALBERT ESCOBAR, Appellant, v. BURTON ROBERTS, as District…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1971

Citations

29 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1971)
324 N.Y.S.2d 318
272 N.E.2d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Weeks

December 18, 1978 Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered March 8, 1978, affirmed (see…

People v. Vasquez

Nothing in Helvering suggests a contrary result, and in the years after it was decided, courts continued to…