From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of E.D.J. Qlty. v. Vil. of Massapequa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1994
204 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 2, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the application is granted, the claimant is awarded an additional allowance in the amount of $28,258.63, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

In this condemnation proceeding, the Village of Massapequa Park initially offered the claimant $96,000. The Supreme Court ultimately awarded the claimant $151,734, based in part on an error in the method of valuation used by the Village's appraiser.

We disagree with the conclusion of the Supreme Court that the award was not substantially in excess of the Village's initial offer (see, EDPL 701; Matter of Malin v. State of New York, 183 A.D.2d 899; Karas v. State of New York, 169 A.D.2d 816). Because the Village does not dispute that the claimant incurred legal and appraisal costs totalling $28,258.63 in prosecuting the subject claim, we award the claimant that amount in order to "achieve just and adequate compensation" (EDPL 701; see, Zappavigna v. State of New York, 186 A.D.2d 557; Matter of Malin v State of New York, supra). Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of E.D.J. Qlty. v. Vil. of Massapequa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1994
204 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of E.D.J. Qlty. v. Vil. of Massapequa

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of E.D.J. QUALITY REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

MATTER OF VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER

We agree with the trial court that the actual value of the property which we have recomputed to be $754,207…

In re Vill. of Port Chester

We agree with the trial court that the actual value of the property which we have recomputed to be $754,207…