From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Detzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1987
134 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 19, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Amos E. Bowman, J.).


A legal basis for any involuntary commitment of the conservatee was absent here since the order appealed from followed only an informal conference-hearing without appointment of a guardian ad litem to safeguard the conservatee's rights. The power of a conservator to carry out a court-approved plan for the preservation, maintenance, and care of the conservatee's income, assets and personal well-being does not authorize involuntary control of the conservatee's person (Mental Hygiene Law § 77.19). Such an order could only follow a plenary hearing, at which a guardian ad litem had been previously appointed to act on behalf of the conservatee, and where the competency issue would be triable as of right by a jury (Mental Hygiene Law § 78.03 [e]). However, our determination herein is entirely without prejudice to a future proceeding under Mental Hygiene Law § 78.03 by the present conservator.

We cannot accept the suggestion of the present conservator that this appeal has been rendered moot by reason of the conservatee's allegedly voluntary hospitalization at Park Shore Manor Health Care Center commencing on May 5, 1987. The voluntariness of such confinement is not foreclosed simply by counsel's representation to that effect, irrespective of its good faith, and remains subject to judicial inquiry upon a proper application.

We would also note that the hearing court was entirely within its power in excluding attorney Kavanagh and his wife from any further participation in the conservatorship proceedings directly before it. Upon inquiry by the court, Kavanagh conceded that he had never been retained by the conservatee or any other competent party, and that his intrusion was, in his own words, "purely pro bono in the interests of constitutional government." That self-appointed role was insufficient to confer standing upon Kavanagh and his nonattorney spouse to intervene (Matter of Association for Retarded Citizens [New York State Assn. for Retarded Children], 94 A.D.2d 958).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Detzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1987
134 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Detzel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Conservatorship of WALLY DETZEL, as Conservatee…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Fisher

It appears that the First Department has also rejected this possible reading of the statute. (Matter of…

Matter of Grinker

The Legislature's intent was to ensure that "older person[s] without close relatives or friends [are able to]…