From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of De Stefano v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 18, 1942.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The claimant was injured when a can of peaches fell and struck him on the nose and eye. Two or three weeks later he noticed that the sight of the eye seemed to be impaired and he told his foreman about this, but he did not notify the foreman of the accident as he was unaware of the causal connection between the symptoms and the accident. He saw his superior only at intervals of several weeks. Some weeks later for the first time he realized that his eye was almost totally without sight and he immediately consulted a physician and then notified the employer. The points raised by the appellant are failure to give written notice and lack of causal relation between the accident and the loss of vision. The State Industrial Board properly excused the failure to give written notice and the evidence supports the finding of causal relation. Award unanimously affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Claim of De Stefano v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Claim of De Stefano v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PATRICK DE STEFANO, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Parker

It is true that the Federal Act is based largely on the New York law. See Employers' Liability Assurance…