From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Count of Erie v. Hoch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 20, 1967
227 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1967

Decided April 20, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD E. KOREMAN, J.

Norman A. Stiller, County Attorney ( Milton S. Weisberg of counsel), for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Robert L. Harrison and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondents.


MEMORANDUM. The order should be modified, without costs to any party, and the matter remitted to Special Term for the entry of a declaratory judgment declaring that, under the 1965 amendments to the Mental Hygiene Law (§ 190-i, subd. 10; § 191-a, subd. 3, par. a; L. 1965, ch. 647), petitioner-appellant is entitled to 50% reimbursement from the State for all hospitalization insurance, State retirement system and social security payments made by petitioner-appellant since June 28, 1965 for those of its employees engaged in an approved community mental health program, and, as modified, affirmed. Under the pertinent provisions of the Mental Hygiene Law as they read prior to June 28, 1965, cities and counties which provided mental health services were entitled to 50% reimbursement from the State for sums expended for "salaries of qualified and necessary personnel" and all "operation, maintenance and service costs". It cannot be said that respondent Commissioner of Mental Hygiene abused his discretion by refusing, under this statute, to reimburse petitioner County of Erie for its employer contributions for hospitalization insurance, retirement under the State Employees' Retirement System and social security coverage. Under the 1965 amendments, however, participating municipalities are now entitled to 50% reimbursement for "all expenditures * * * incurred by a * * * county for qualified and necessary personnel". This language is broad and unambiguous; therefore, petitioner-appellant is entitled to reimbursement from the State for all sums expended for such employer contributions since the effective date of the new law, June 28, 1965.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL concur.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Count of Erie v. Hoch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 20, 1967
227 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Count of Erie v. Hoch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the COUNTY OF ERIE, Appellant v. PAUL H. HOCH, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 20, 1967

Citations

227 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1967)
227 N.E.2d 399
280 N.Y.S.2d 584

Citing Cases

Hilligoss v. LaDow

They represent another form of compensation distinct from the employee's regular salary. E.g., County of Erie…

Erie County v. Whalen

This limiting language goes all the way back to 1924 (L 1924, ch 278, § 1), the year after provisions…