From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Conners v. Zoning B of a Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.)


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead to grant variances to the intervenor-respondent Channel View Realty Corp. was rationally based and thus was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Accordingly, the petition was properly denied and the proceeding dismissed ( see, Matter of Fuhst v. Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441).

Bracken, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Conners v. Zoning B of a Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Conners v. Zoning B of a Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PATRICIA C. CONNERS et al., Appellants, v. ZONING BOARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Mccabe v. Town of Clarkstown

The respondent Town of Clarkstown Board of Appeals properly applied Town Law § 267-b (3) in considering the…