From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Commerce Ind. Ins Co. v. Nester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1996
230 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

In Matter of Commerce Indus. Ins. Co. v. Nester (230 A.D.2d 795, affd 90 N.Y.2d 255), under circumstances indistinguishable from those in this case, this court dismissed an insurer's appeal, holding that the appellant "participated in the arbitration following the Supreme Court's denial of its application for a stay, and it has therefore forfeited its right to appellate review of the Supreme Court's judgment" (Matter of Commerce Indus. Ins. Co. v. Nester, supra at 795).

Summary of this case from In re One Beacon Ins. C. v. Bloch

Opinion

August 12, 1996


In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), dated September 24, 1993, which dismissed the proceeding and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant participated in the arbitration following the Supreme Court's denial of its application for a stay, and it has therefore forfeited its right to appellate review of the Supreme Court's judgment ( see, Matter of Beagle [MVAIC], 19 N.Y.2d 834; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Blumen, 221 A.D.2d 548; Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Rothbart, 220 A.D.2d 509). Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


concur in the decision to dismiss the appeal on constraint of Matter of Beagle (MVAIC) ( 19 N.Y.2d 834) and related cases ( see, e.g., Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Blumen, 221 A.D.2d 548; Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Rothbart, 220 A.D.2d 509).

However, in view of the fact that there exists another line of cases which stand for the general rule that coverage cannot be created by estoppel ( see, e.g., Zappone v Home Ins. Co., 55 N.Y.2d 131; Matter of Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v Freda, 156 A.D.2d 364), that rule should be applicable in a case such as the instant one where the insurer participated in the arbitration only after unsuccessfully seeking a stay of arbitration upon the ground that no coverage existed under the policy.


Summaries of

Matter of Commerce Ind. Ins Co. v. Nester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1996
230 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

In Matter of Commerce Indus. Ins. Co. v. Nester (230 A.D.2d 795, affd 90 N.Y.2d 255), under circumstances indistinguishable from those in this case, this court dismissed an insurer's appeal, holding that the appellant "participated in the arbitration following the Supreme Court's denial of its application for a stay, and it has therefore forfeited its right to appellate review of the Supreme Court's judgment" (Matter of Commerce Indus. Ins. Co. v. Nester, supra at 795).

Summary of this case from In re One Beacon Ins. C. v. Bloch
Case details for

Matter of Commerce Ind. Ins Co. v. Nester

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 12, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 527

Citing Cases

Matter of Allstate Insurance Co. v. Romero

At oral argument, the parties admitted that they had proceeded to arbitration in this matter, and handed a…

In the Matter of Windsor Group v. Gentilcore

The arbitration resulted in an award to the respondent. The petitioner did not seek interim relief from this…