From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cohen v. Roger H. Bohrer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington that the petitioners' proposed business use of their residential property was not "similar * * * by reason of education, training and experience" to those home occupations which are set forth in the zoning ordinance at issue was neither unreasonable, irrational, nor an improvident exercise of discretion ( see, Matter of Frishman v. Schmidt, 61 N.Y.2d 823; Matter of Simon v. Board of Appeals, 208 A.D.2d 931; Corter v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 46 A.D.2d 184).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cohen v. Roger H. Bohrer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1998
249 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Cohen v. Roger H. Bohrer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STANLEY COHEN et al., Appellants, v. ROGER H. BOHRER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

In re Sanantonio

The ZBA considered this zoning provision during its review of the petitioner's application. "[I]t is a…