From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1994
205 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 30, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.H.O.).


Respondent argues that her multi-drug resistant tuberculosis can be treated, and the public health protected, by means less restrictive than detention in a hospital pursuant to section 11.47 of the New York City Health Code. We disagree. Clear and convincing evidence of respondent's inability to comply with the projected 18 to 24 month prescribed course of medication in a less restrictive environment was provided by proof of her history of drug abuse, unstable or uncertain housing accommodations, apparent inability, as demonstrated by her own testimony, to understand the nature and seriousness of her condition, and refusal to cooperate with petitioner's repeated efforts to have her participate in voluntary forms of directly observed therapy.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1994
205 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, v. MARY DOE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 8

Citing Cases

City of New York v. Antoinette R.

The petitioner has demonstrated through clear and convincing evidence the respondent's inability to comply…

Best v. St. Vincents Hospital

In New York, the detention of an individual with TB has been upheld by state courts based on a finding of an…