Argued September 29, 1910
Decided October 18, 1910
Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Charles D. Olendorf of counsel), for appellant.
Edmund L. Baylies and Edwin D. Bechtel for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 18, 1910
That is a question that perhaps has not been finally authoritatively decided with respect to such a permit as…
Matter of City of New YorkAn act may be as expressive as a word. If the dock department had no authority to issue a revocable license…