From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Fulton v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Summary

finding $50,000 in mental anguish damages to be excessive and awarding $10,000 where plaintiff felt "very upset and disappointed," "bad," "lost sleep," and was "mean at home"

Summary of this case from Walia v. Vivek Purmasir Assocs. Inc.

Opinion

November 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hurlbutt, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners City of Fulton, Fulton Fire Department and Fulton Department of Civil Service commenced this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 seeking to review so much of the final order of the New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) as awarded respondent Carl M. Emmons, Sr. (Emmons) compensatory damages for mental anguish in the amount of $50,000 and awarded interest on an award of $1,869 for loss of employment opportunity from July 5, 1986. The proceeding was transferred to our Court pursuant to Executive Law § 298.

We conclude that the award of damages for mental anguish is excessive. Emmons testified that, as a result of petitioners' discriminatory conduct in disqualifying him for a position of fire fighter on the basis of physical disability, he felt "very upset and disappointed", and "bad", and that he was not being treated fairly; that he was "mean at home" and took it out on his wife and kids; and that he lost sleep over it and thinks about it "[a]ll the time". However, he never sought medical treatment. Although proof of mental anguish and humiliation may be established by the testimony of the complainant alone (see, Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 207 A.D.2d 585, 586), an award of $10,000 is more consistent with awards for comparable injuries and proof of mental anguish made in similar cases (see, Matter of Laverack Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 217 A.D.2d 955; Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra; Matter of Marcellus Volunteer Fire Dept. v Stock, 155 A.D.2d 982).

Also, the award of interest on loss of employment opportunity from July 5, 1986, when damages ceased to accrue, is erroneous. Pursuant to CPLR 5002 and 5004, interest is due at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the Commissioner's order, November 22, 1994 (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. Gissha White Plains Corp., 107 A.D.2d 750; State Div. of Human Rights v Massive Economic Neighborhood Dev., 47 A.D.2d 187, 189).

Thus, we modify the determination by reducing the award for mental anguish to $10,000 and by providing that interest accrue on the award for loss of employment opportunity from November 22, 1994, and otherwise confirm the determination.


Summaries of

City of Fulton v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1995
221 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

finding $50,000 in mental anguish damages to be excessive and awarding $10,000 where plaintiff felt "very upset and disappointed," "bad," "lost sleep," and was "mean at home"

Summary of this case from Walia v. Vivek Purmasir Assocs. Inc.

reducing award of $50,000 to $10,000 because evidence of mental anguish from discriminatory treatment on the basis of disability was not corroborated

Summary of this case from Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

reducing award of $50,000 to $10,000 to plaintiff who testified about being "very upset and disappointed," losing sleep, and treating his family differently

Summary of this case from Ortiz-Del Valle v. National Basketball Ass'n
Case details for

City of Fulton v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CITY OF FULTON et al., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Walia v. Vivek Purmasir Assocs. Inc.

Under the NYHRL, plaintiff is entitled to seek compensatory damages, including damages for mental anguish and…

Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

imination on the basis of age and gender); State Div. of Human Rights v. County of Onondaga Sheriff's Dept.,…