From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chiodo v. Newhall Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1930
173 N.E. 854 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued May 12, 1930

Decided June 3, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Newell H. Timerman for appellants.

Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: LEHMAN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Chiodo v. Newhall Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1930
173 N.E. 854 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

Matter of Chiodo v. Newhall Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN CHIODO, Respondent, against THE NEWHALL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 3, 1930

Citations

173 N.E. 854 (N.Y. 1930)
173 N.E. 854

Citing Cases

Zipprich v. Smith Trucking Co.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. In the Creaser case, there was sufficient evidence to entitle…

Yarbrough v. Polar Ice Fuel Co.

The Industrial Board concluded otherwise and found "that the injury that the plaintiff sustained on June 14,…