From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Chaconis v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 17, 1939
257 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

May 17, 1939.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Law.


Claimant was a marine stoker by trade but was a member of the crew of the ferryboat Elmhurst and working as an oiler on this boat. While climbing over the quarter deck railing to get on the gangway he fell back on the deck and was injured. The boat plied on the navigable waters of the harbor of New York between two points within New York State. The State Industrial Board found that the status of the claimant and the employer was a matter of local concern and subject to regulation of the State and that the assumption of jurisdiction by the State Industrial Board in no way worked prejudice to any characteristic feature of the general maritime law. This was an apparent effort to bring the case within the doctrine of Miller's Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud ( 270 U.S. 59). Award reversed and claim dismissed. (See London Guarantee Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 279 U.S. 109; Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen, 244 id. 205.) All concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Chaconis v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 17, 1939
257 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Matter of Chaconis v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MANUEL CHACONIS, Respondent, against THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 17, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Maloney v. State of New York

In Goldstein v. State of New York ( 281 N.Y. 396, 406, supra), this court said: "`But it is not true that…

Frame v. City of New York

It is immaterial in this regard that municipal liability in tort in New York generally is a matter within the…