From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caro, Respondent, v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1973
41 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Summary

In Matter of Caro v. Jones (41 A.D.2d 829) the Appellate Division, First Department, affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss a petition said: "Regardless of the alleged infirmities in the manner of the service of the order to show cause, there was a showing of actual notice to the respondent below who, in fact, did appear at the court on the return day of the order to show cause".

Summary of this case from Matter of Fagenson v. First-York 86th St.

Opinion

April 27, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 24, 1973, denying respondent's motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Regardless of the alleged infirmities in the manner of the service of the order to show cause, there was a showing of actual notice to the respondent below, who, in fact, did appear at the court on the return day of the order to show cause.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Lane and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Caro, Respondent, v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1973
41 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

In Matter of Caro v. Jones (41 A.D.2d 829) the Appellate Division, First Department, affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss a petition said: "Regardless of the alleged infirmities in the manner of the service of the order to show cause, there was a showing of actual notice to the respondent below who, in fact, did appear at the court on the return day of the order to show cause".

Summary of this case from Matter of Fagenson v. First-York 86th St.
Case details for

Caro, Respondent, v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID CARO, Respondent, v. GWENDOLYN JONES, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Ulster Savings Bank v. Total Communities, Inc.

Furthermore, upon the return day of the motion, it appeared that duly executed consents substituting movants'…

Slagen v. Marwill

The process server here acted reasonably and diligently in attempting to fulfill the statutory requirements…