From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Capote v. Our Lady of Mercy Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 238 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

dismissing due process claims

Summary of this case from Rose v. Taddonio

Opinion

December 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.).


In November 1988, petitioner was suspended from the medical staff of the respondent medical center. He claimed in a CPLR article 78 petition that the medical center failed to notify him of the specific charges against him, and failed to provide him a due process hearing. The statutory procedure by which a physician may challenge a termination of hospital privileges is a two-step process, the first of which is review of the physician's claim by the Public Health Council, pursuant to Public Health Law § 2801-b. Only if the parties are thereafter unable to resolve their differences may the physician commence an action to enjoin the hospital from unjustifiably denying professional privileges or staff membership in violation of Public Health Law § 2801-b (Matter of Cohoes Mem. Hosp. v. Department of Health, 48 N.Y.2d 583, 588). The petitioner's failure to follow this procedure required dismissal of his petition as premature. Such a disposition is all the more appropriate here since we have been apprised post the argument of the appeal that petitioner has sought administrative relief.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Capote v. Our Lady of Mercy Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 238 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

dismissing due process claims

Summary of this case from Rose v. Taddonio
Case details for

Matter of Capote v. Our Lady of Mercy Med

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM CAPOTE, Appellant, v. OUR LADY OF MERCY MEDICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 238 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Rose v. Taddonio

, 642 N.Y.S.2d at 180, 664 N.E.2d at 1242, and claims for damages which turn on whether there was a…

Shapiro v. Central General Hospital, Inc.

In light of the late notification of suspension, we find that the plaintiff should not be precluded from…