From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Camacho v. Doe

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Oct 10, 1958
31 Misc. 2d 692 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)

Opinion

October 10, 1958

Gene Crescenzi for petitioner.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel, for respondents.


Motion for an order requiring the respondents Inspectors of Election in the election district in which petitioner claims residence to permit him to prove his literacy, at his option, in English or Spanish, and to permit him to register, is denied. It is conceded that petitioner is a citizen of the United States by reason of his being a native of Puerto Rico.

The Constitution of the State of New York and its statutes require that in order to vote all persons, except for physical disability, must be able to read and write English (N.Y. Const., art. II, § 1; Election Law, §§ 150, 168, 201). None of these provisions contravene the United States Constitution. The petitioner is not denied the right to vote. Under the laws of this State, however, he must first learn to read and write English. This cannot be deemed an unreasonable requirement.

The court finds no merit in the claims of petitioner that the treaty and the United States statutes relied upon afford him any rights not enjoyed by other citizens.


Summaries of

Matter of Camacho v. Doe

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Oct 10, 1958
31 Misc. 2d 692 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Camacho v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. JOHN DOE et al., Whose True…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County

Date published: Oct 10, 1958

Citations

31 Misc. 2d 692 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1958)
221 N.Y.S.2d 262

Citing Cases

United States v. County Bd. of Elections of Monroe County, New York

In Lassiter v. Northhampton Election Board, 360 U.S. 45, 79 S.Ct. 985, 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1959), the North…

Morgan v. Katzenbach

The New York courts have sustained the validity of the literacy test. Camacho v. Doe, 7 N.Y.2d 762, 763, 194…