From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 976 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1984

Decided March 22, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alfred H. Kleiman, J.

Anthony Napolitano and Jon Michael Probstein for appellants.

Cullen S. McVoy, Ellis S. Franke and Mary Ellen Cronly for Conciliation and Appeals Board, respondent.

Stanley M. Ackert, III, for Daniel Gersen, respondent.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan ( 94 A.D.2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 976 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CALE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., et al., Appellants, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 976 (N.Y. 1984)
475 N.Y.S.2d 278
463 N.E.2d 619

Citing Cases

Schwartz Landes Assoc v. Cab

(See, e.g., Matter of Cale Dev. Co. v. Conciliation Appeals Bd., supra, at pp 232-235.) Secondly, assuming…

Manocherian v. Lenox Hosp

They argued that absent Chapter 940, the issues herein were governed by the RSL as amended by the OHA, and…