From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cajun Elec. Power Co-op

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1996
74 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 1996)

Summary

adopting dissent at 69 F.3d at 751

Summary of this case from In re Marvel Entertainment Group

Opinion

No. 95-30760.

January 25, 1996.

William Hardy Patrick, III, William H. Patrick, Baton Rouge, LA, John C. Weitnauer, Richard Neal Batson, Alston Bird, Atlanta, GA, for Cajun Elec. Power Co-op., Inc.

R. Patrick Vance, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere Denegre, New Orleans, LA, for American Commercial Terminals.

Richard E. Matheny, Gordon, Arata, McCollam Duplantis, Baton Rouge, LA, Ewell E. Eagan, Jr. and C. Peck Hayne, Jr., Gordon, Arata, McCollam Duplantis, New Orleans, LA, Alan C. Wolf, New Orleans, LA, for Central Louisiana Elec. Co-op., Inc.

Thomas Marx Bondy, William Ruth Kanter, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Division Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for U.S. on behalf of Rural Utilities Serv.

John S. Koppel, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, for U.S. on behalf of Rural Utilities Serv. and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.

Nicholas F. LaRocca, Jr., Morgan City, LA, for Teche Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Tom F. Phillips, Taylor, Porter, Brooks Phillips, Baton Rouge, LA, David J. Messina, Taylor, Porter, Brooks Phillips, New Orleans, LA, for Gulf States Utilities Co.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 20, 1996, 5th Cir., 1995, 69 F.3d 746).

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.


ORDER OF THE COURT:

Taking the petitions suggesting rehearing en banc as petitions for rehearing, said petitions for rehearing are hereby GRANTED as follows:

"After re-reading the stipulation on file in this case, we find the conflicts of interest within the members of the Board of Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., to be such that the court below was correct in the appointment of a trustee. We therefore withdraw all of section IV of the prior opinion found at 69 F.3d 746 and we adopt the reasoning of the dissent in its place.

The appointment of a trustee is therefore AFFIRMED."


Summaries of

Matter of Cajun Elec. Power Co-op

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1996
74 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 1996)

adopting dissent at 69 F.3d at 751

Summary of this case from In re Marvel Entertainment Group

adopting on rehearing the opinion of dissent in 69 F.3d at 751

Summary of this case from In re Marvel Entertainment Group

adopting dissent at 69 F.3d at 751

Summary of this case from In re Thomas

adopting on rehearing the opinion of the dissent in 69 F.3d 746, 751 (5th Cir. 1995)

Summary of this case from In re Thomas

adopting on rehearing the dissent's opinion in 69 F.3d at 751

Summary of this case from In re Sundale, Ltd.

adopting on reh'g the opinion of dissent in 69 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 1995)

Summary of this case from In re National Farm Financial Corporation

adopting on rehearing the dissent at 69 F.3d 746 at 751

Summary of this case from In re Intercat, Inc.

adopting on rehearing the opinion of dissent in 69 F.3d 746 at 751

Summary of this case from In re Intercat, Inc.

authorizing appointment of trustee in the instant case

Summary of this case from Matter of Cajun Elec. Power CO-OP., Inc.

withdrawing section IV and adopting reasoning of dissent in prior opinion

Summary of this case from In re Patman Drilling International, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Cajun Elec. Power Co-op

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAJUN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., Debtor. CAJUN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1996

Citations

74 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

In re Thomas

In addition, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee under 11 U.S.C. 1104(a)(1)…

In re Marvel Entertainment Group

Id. The Code itself, therefore, does not prohibit the appointment of a trustee based on a finding of acrimony…