From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Buhler

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions
Mar 1, 1904
43 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1904)

Opinion

March, 1904.

Thomas F. Magner for application.

John B. Merrill opposed.


The petitioner was appointed crier of the courts of record of Queens county by the County Judge, under section 91 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and served as such until January 2d 1904, when he was removed without charges by the respondent, who is County Judge. He was a public officer (Throop on Pub. Officers, ch. 1; Rowland v. Mayor, 83 N.Y. 372). He claims that he is irremovable except on charges and after a hearing because he is a veteran fireman. But he is ineligible to the office. He does not reside in Queens county but in Nassau county. He was a resident of Queens county when appointed, but in that part of it which was afterwards set off as Nassau county, and he resides in the same place still. By section 3 of the Public Officers Law no person is capable of holding a local office unless he be a resident of the municipal corporation or local subdivision within which his official functions are to be exercised; and by section 20 the office becomes vacant by his ceasing to be such resident (People ex rel. Grogan v. Glass, 19 A.D. 454).

The application is denied without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Buhler

Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions
Mar 1, 1904
43 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1904)
Case details for

Matter of Buhler

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHN BUHLER FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Court:Supreme Court, Kings Special Term for Motions

Date published: Mar 1, 1904

Citations

43 Misc. 140 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1904)
88 N.Y.S. 195

Citing Cases

Matter of Daniman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y

Other statutes provide for the vacatur of, or forfeiture of, an office or employment upon the happening of an…