From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brown v. Board of Educ., City, New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1965
213 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued October 19, 1965

Decided November 24, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, BENJAMIN BRENNER, J.

Henry C. Woicik for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Eugene M. Kaufman, Seymour B. Quel and Joseph M. Callahan, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs. Under subdivision 7a of section 106 of the by-laws of the Board of Education of the City of New York, petitioner-appellant may at any time apply to the medical bureau of the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Schools to terminate her inactive status and, in event of an adverse decision, may review it in an article 78 proceeding.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Brown v. Board of Educ., City, New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 24, 1965
213 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Brown v. Board of Educ., City, New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHIRLEY BROWN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 24, 1965

Citations

213 N.E.2d 314 (N.Y. 1965)
213 N.E.2d 314
265 N.Y.S.2d 903

Citing Cases

Strong v. Uniondale Union Free School Dist

On the other hand, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a prior hearing is not necessary before…

Newman v. Board of Education

See also N.Y.Educ.Law §§ 2554, 2566 and § 106, subdiv. 7a of the By-Laws of the Board of Education of the…