From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Borkhuis v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

In Borkhuis v. Quinn, 158 AD2d 917 (4th Dept 1990), the court held that the dismissal of a school bus driver on three charges of misconduct was shocking to one's sense of fairness where the driver had an excellent driving record for 20 years, and received awards and commendations for her work; "[u]nder the circumstances presented, we consider a suspension without pay for 12 months to be the most severe sanction that should be imposed."

Summary of this case from In re Middleton v. N.Y.C. D.O.E.

Opinion

February 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Steuben County, Finnerty, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs, and matter remitted to respondents for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The determination that petitioner, a school bus driver, was guilty of three charges of misconduct is supported by substantial evidence. However, since petitioner had an excellent driving record for 20 years and has received awards and commendations for her work, the penalty of dismissal is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233-234). Therefore, we remit the matter to respondents for imposition of an appropriate sanction. Under the circumstances, we consider a suspension without pay for 12 months to be the most severe sanction that should be imposed (see, Matter of Harris v Mechanicville Cent. School Dist., 45 N.Y.2d 279, 285; Matter of Gross v Mariglio, 149 A.D.2d 922, 923). We have examined petitioner's remaining contention and find it lacking in merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Borkhuis v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

In Borkhuis v. Quinn, 158 AD2d 917 (4th Dept 1990), the court held that the dismissal of a school bus driver on three charges of misconduct was shocking to one's sense of fairness where the driver had an excellent driving record for 20 years, and received awards and commendations for her work; "[u]nder the circumstances presented, we consider a suspension without pay for 12 months to be the most severe sanction that should be imposed."

Summary of this case from In re Middleton v. N.Y.C. D.O.E.
Case details for

Matter of Borkhuis v. Quinn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA BORKHUIS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM F. QUINN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 82

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Bd. of Educ., Onteora Cent

In our view respondent did not give sufficient weight to mitigating factors present warranting imposition of…

Ross v. Oxford Academy & Central School District

In this regard, we note that although there was conflicting testimony, it was for respondent to assess…