From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bondi v. Bus. Educ. Forum, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1976
52 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 21, 1976

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs, to appellant. Memorandum: The parties have submitted this appeal on a record which does not contain the petition and certain other pertinent documents. The briefs contain statements of fact, however, which indicate no dispute of fact, and we accept them as supplementing the record. Moreover, upon the argument it was stipulated that the petition requests examination of respondent's minutes and books of account and records from 1968 to date and that the appeal be deemed an appeal from the order insofar as it failed to grant such relief. As the owner since 1968 of 5,000 shares of common stock of respondent corporation, in the spring of 1974 petitioner sought leave to inspect the books and records of the corporation, to inquire into the reason for its economic difficulties. When his request was refused he instituted an article 78 proceeding for an order directing respondent to permit him to inspect its minute books and books of account and records. In July 1974 Special Term, per Justice Moore, found that issues of fact existed concerning petitioner's good faith and purpose in seeking the inspection, and he directed that a hearing be had to resolve those issues. A hearing thereon was conducted before Justice Abbott, after which on December 3, 1974 he wrote a memorandum containing his conclusions that "petitioner's request is made in good faith and for the proper purposes of protecting his investment and ascertaining whether the respondent corporation is being properly managed". Before an order was entered upon that decision, Justice Abbott retired from office. Based upon Justice Abbott's decision, application was then made at Special Term for an order directing respondent to permit petitioner to examine and inspect the minutes of the proceedings of the shareholders and directors and respondent's books of account and records, and make copies therefrom. Special Term, O'Donnell, J., granted the application in part only, to wit, for the period of two years preceding his order, and limited it to inspection of the minutes and the balance sheets and annual profit and loss statements; in effect Special Term denied the application except for the corporate minutes and the balance sheets and annual profit and loss statements for the two-year period. Petitioner appeals from the order only insofar as it denied him complete relief. Under the common law and the statute (Business Corporation Law, § 624) a stockholder who is acting in good faith and for the purpose of protecting his investment and ascertaining whether the corporation is being properly managed, has the right to inspect the corporate minutes and books of account and records at reasonable hours and in a manner which will not unduly disturb the corporation in the conduct of its affairs, the latter to be determined in the sound discretion of the court (Matter of Durr v Paragon Trading Corp., 270 N.Y. 464; Matter of Steinway, 159 N.Y. 250; Matter of Waldman v Eldorado Towers, 25 A.D.2d 836, affd 19 N.Y.2d 843; Matter of Malone v Dimco Corp., 68 Misc.2d 610, affd 38 A.D.2d 781; Business Corporation Law, § 624; 3 White, New York Corporations (13th ed), § 624.03 subds [1], [3]). Petitioner is especially entitled to the examination in view of the offer by the directors of the corporation to buy his stock at a grossly reduced price (Matter of Waldman v Eldorado Towers, supra; Matter of Smilkstein v Smilkstein Sons, 32 Misc.2d 882). No reason was assigned by Special Term for curtailing petitioner's inspection rights as it did; and it was an abuse of the court's discretion to deny any part of the application. The order should, therefore, be modified by expanding its scope in accordance with the application, subject only to the provision that the inspection, to proceed at once, may not unduly disturb the corporation in the conduct of its affairs. If the parties cannot agree in this respect, Special Term shall prescribe the details of the times and manner of the inspection.


Summaries of

Matter of Bondi v. Bus. Educ. Forum, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1976
52 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Bondi v. Bus. Educ. Forum, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN BONDI, Appellant, v. BUSINESS EDUCATION FORUM, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 21, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Wells v. LEAGUE OF THEATRES

It is in the court's discretion to exercise its authority to limit or expand the scope of members' inspection…

Wells v. League of Theatres

It is in the Court's discretion to exercise its authority to limit or expand the scope of members'…