From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bogey's v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1985
114 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 7, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Owen, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner applied on or about February 1, 1984 for a cabaret license to continue a nonconforming use. The six-month period provided for by White Plains Zoning Ordinance § 4.3.2.5, within which any nonconforming use must resume or be deemed discontinued, was tolled until April 12, 1984, the date on which a bankruptcy court ordered a trustee in bankruptcy to deliver a lease to petitioner, by operation of the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. § 362 (see, Matter of IDH Realty v Incorporated Vil. of Mineola, 16 B.R. 55). Therefore, appellants' November 5, 1984 denial of petitioner's application was arbitrary and capricious, because it was only appellants' own retention of the application which prevented resumption of cabaret activity within six months from the date the stay terminated. Lazer, J.P., O'Connor, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Bogey's v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1985
114 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Bogey's v. City of White Plains

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BOGEY'S EMPORIUM, INC., Respondent, v. CITY OF WHITE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 363 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sapakoff v. Town of Hague Zoning Bd.

Concluding that section 9.030 (1) of the zoning ordinance was not tolled during this period, we find that…

Matter of Pelham Esplanade v. Bd. of Trustees

Ordered that the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, the application is…