From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Biscaglio v. Roshan Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 1974
43 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

February 14, 1974


Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on May 12, 1972, denying a motion to "renew and reargue" the denial of a prior motion to remove an action from the Civil Court, New York County, to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, and to serve an amended complaint with an increased ad damnum clause, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. While characterized as a motion for renewal, the motion papers presented no additional facts which were not before the court on the prior motion. The motion was therefore one for reargument, and as such, the order denying the motion was nonappealable. ( Roberts v. Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813; 2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac., par. 2201.03.)

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Murphy, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Biscaglio v. Roshan Taxi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 1974
43 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Biscaglio v. Roshan Taxi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALBERT BISCAGLIO, Appellant, v. ROSHAN TAXI, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Weber v. Cassius

Special Term determined that the papers presented on the motion contained no new evidence which would warrant…

Sunbeam Corp. v. Morris Distributing Co., Inc.

ers and because of plaintiffs' wrongful termination of the alleged agreements, and while they are not totally…