From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beverly Lanes v. Rohan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1962
182 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued April 3, 1962

Decided April 26, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

Emanuel D. Black and Hyman Amsel for appellants.

Philip S. Gellman and Robert I. Millonzi for respondent.


Order reversed, determination of the State Liquor Authority reinstated and petition dismissed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to affirm ( Matter of Sheibar v. New York State Liq. Auth., 4 A.D.2d 442, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 984).


Summaries of

Matter of Beverly Lanes v. Rohan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1962
182 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Matter of Beverly Lanes v. Rohan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BEVERLY LANES, INC., Respondent, v. THOMAS E. ROHAN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1962

Citations

182 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1962)
182 N.E.2d 813
228 N.Y.S.2d 469

Citing Cases

Sherman v. Robinson

That argument is premised on cases seeking administrative sanctions under Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §…

Matter of Tavern v. New York St. Liquor Auth

a finding that petitioner violated the above-cited statute. In order to find a licensee guilty of such…