From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1972
40 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

September 1, 1972


The cross motion to dismiss the purported appeal by intervenors is granted because they have no standing, since they were not parties to the original proceeding and permission to intervene was given after the time to appeal had expired. The motion for a stay of enforcement of the order of Justice Fino, entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on or about June 3, 1972, granting interim base rent orders and the motion by Robert Abrams, President of the Borough of Bronx, requesting leave to intervene or alternatively to file a brief amicus curiae, are denied as moot and academic. The stay, dated August 29, 1972, affixed to the notice of motion, is vacated.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, McNally, Steuer, and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1972
40 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BENSON REALTY CORP. v. ALBERT A. WALSH et al

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Matter of City of Amsterdam v. N.Y. State Dot

Motion by Edmund D. Calleo as a member of a class of concerned citizens of the Fifth Ward of the City of…

Auerbach v. Bennett

Because Wallenstein came within the ambit of a "party aggrieved" as that term is employed in CPLR 5511, no…