From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Belding Heminway Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 681 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Submitted June 13, 1946

Decided July 23, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, HECHT, J.

William R. Fisher and Frank C. Fisher for appellant. Edward Kuntz for respondent.


Whether the appellant was bound to employ at its New Jersey plant members of the respondent union was a debatable question which called for a decision as to the scope of the collective bargaining agreement between the parties. This question, we think, was for the court, not for the arbitrators. ( Matter of Bullard v. Grace Co., 240 N.Y. 388, 395.) The orders should be reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term for decision of the preliminary issue above stated.

The orders should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion, with costs to abide the event.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and FULD, JJ., concur; DYE, J., taking no part.

Orders reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Belding Heminway Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
68 N.E.2d 681 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

Matter of Belding Heminway Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between BELDING HEMINWAY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 1946

Citations

68 N.E.2d 681 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 681

Citing Cases

Matter of Camhi

At the same time, it is true that petitioner, individually and as a partner, is still subject to an…

Matter of Triple P

Respondent concedes that, but states that it is not asking for an award against the clear terms of the…