From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beekman v. New York Evening Journal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 1939
258 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

November 15, 1939.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


Claimant suffered a total loss of vision in his left eye as the result of an accident. Previous to the accident he was blind in his right eye. In addition to an award for permanent partial disability he was declared a total permanent disability case, and benefits on account thereof were directed to be paid from the Special Fund. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 8.) An award for disfigurement should be based upon loss of earning capacity. ( Matter of Sweeting v. American Knife Co., 226 N.Y. 199.) It is not properly made where permanent disability is found. ( Clark v. Hayes, 207 App. Div. 560; affd., 238 N.Y. 553; Matter of Freeland v. Endicott Forging and Mfg. Co., 233 App. Div. 440.) Award, in so far as appealed from, reversed and claim dismissed. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Beekman v. New York Evening Journal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 1939
258 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Matter of Beekman v. New York Evening Journal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of OTTO W. BEEKMAN, Respondent, against NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1939

Citations

258 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Pillsbury

3, par. t. And they have been interpreted by the New York courts to mean that an award for disability that is…

Rupert v. Todd Shipyards Corporation

) And they have been interpreted by the New York courts to mean that an award for disability that is both…