From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baron v. W.W. Norton Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

May 6, 1942.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


No award of compensation was made because the period of disability was less than seven days. The decision is appealable because it comes within the purview of section 23 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, and because it might establish a basis for recovery of medical expenses. The decision itself, however, is erroneous as a matter of law on the undisputed facts. Claimant was a traveling salesman. When the accident happened he was eating a meal at a public restaurant. During the course of the meal a chicken bone became lodged in his throat, and medical treatment was required for his relief. At the time of the accident he was not engaged in the course of his employment. ( Matter of Johnson v. Smith, 263 N.Y. 10; Matter of Goldman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 276 id. 582.) Decision reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board. Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Baron v. W.W. Norton Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Baron v. W.W. Norton Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HAROLD BARON, Respondent, against W.W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 6, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sheldon v. Broughton Corporation

The record does not establish that the meat itself was defective and the board's determination that the act…

Matter of Piekut v. Fleischer, Inc.

The court seemed also to consider it important that the decision was filed and a notice served on the parties…