From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Barbara

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 866 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1985

Decided February 21, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, William J. Deeley, J.

Dennis B. Feld for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Christopher Keith Hall, Peter Sherwood, Richard Rifkin, Thomas P. Dorsey and Robert L. Schonfeld of counsel), for respondent.


Appeal dismissed, without costs, for mootness. The constitutional questions which are the only issues the appellant now presents to this court were not raised or preserved in the trial court. There is therefore no basis for this court to exercise its discretion to retain the appeal despite the mootness, when the issues tendered are not within the scope of our review. Unlike the Appellate Division which may reach and decide issues which are not properly preserved, this court is limited to reviewing questions of law.


Summaries of

Matter of Barbara

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1985
64 N.Y.2d 866 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Barbara

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BARBARA C. JOHN J. SABATOS, as Director of the Brooklyn…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 21, 1985

Citations

64 N.Y.2d 866 (N.Y. 1985)
487 N.Y.S.2d 549
476 N.E.2d 994

Citing Cases

Vigilant v. Stearns

Proskauer Rose LLP, New York City ( John H. Gross, Seth B. Schafler, Francis D. Landrey, Matthew J. Morris…

People v. Weber

This is not a case in which a party failed to present an issue to the SORA court and then asked the…