From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Dime Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 27, 1995
650 N.E.2d 846 (N.Y. 1995)

Opinion

Argued March 29, 1995

Decided April 27, 1995

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Joscelyn E. Smith, J.

Melvin S. Hirshowitz, New York City, for appellant.

No appearance for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Under CPLR 5205 (c) (1) and (2) as amended in 1989 (L 1989, ch 84), an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) created pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 408 (d) (3) as a result of rollovers from either "a Keogh (HR-10), retirement or other [qualified section 401] plan established by a corporation" is exempt from a judgment creditor's levy. That exemption, which was in effect at the time this enforcement proceeding was instituted, applied to the IRA account that respondent McCain maintained at respondent Dime Savings Bank, since the account was created as a result of a timely rollover of the funds that were previously held in McCain's former employer's qualified Pension, Profit and Stock Bonus Plan pursuant to section 401 (k) of the Internal Revenue Code (see, 26 U.S.C. § 402 [c] [3]; § 408 [d] [3] [A] [i]). The fact that the IRA account was created before the 1989 amendment became effective is of no moment, since the controlling event in this context is petitioner judgment creditor's effort to levy against this presently exempt fund. Accordingly, the courts below erred in granting the petition.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Dime Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 27, 1995
650 N.E.2d 846 (N.Y. 1995)
Case details for

Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Dime Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BANK LEUMI TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIME…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 27, 1995

Citations

650 N.E.2d 846 (N.Y. 1995)
650 N.E.2d 846
626 N.Y.S.2d 999

Citing Cases

Rech v. Rech

We agree with defendant's contention in appeal No. 2 that the court erred in granting in part plaintiff's…

Pauk v. Pauk

We now reverse. Effective September 1, 1994, CPLR 5205 (c) (2) was amended to include IRAs as accounts that…