From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 20, 1943
50 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1943)

Opinion

Argued June 10, 1943

Decided July 20, 1943

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, WALTER, J.

Spencer Pinkham, Henry F. Holthusen and Lawrence S. Pratt for appellants in first above-entitled proceeding.

David Paine, George Koegler and Francis D. Kalosky for appellants in second above-entitled proceeding.

Frederick E. Crane, Arthur Garfield Hayes, John Schulman and Morris Shilensky for respondent.




Orders affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the final judgment within the meaning of the statute had been entered before the date when the statute went into effect. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: LEWIS, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 20, 1943
50 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1943)
Case details for

Matter of Bailey v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of FRANK BAILEY et al., Appellants, for…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 20, 1943

Citations

50 N.E.2d 653 (N.Y. 1943)
50 N.E.2d 653

Citing Cases

Amdur v. Meyer

Section 61-b of the same law provides that in a suit maintained in the right of a corporation by a…

Yoli v. Yoli

A law is not per se unconstitutional merely because it may be retroactive in effect. There are no such…