From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonucci v. Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1977
366 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 1977

Decided June 9, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Francis J. Sisca for appellant.

James M. Rose and Arthur H. Grae for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and the determination of the superintendent of schools reinstated. The record supports the more severe sanction imposed on petitioner because of his supervisory status, a difference in the charges, and evidence establishing the deliberateness of his conduct. Hence, the sanction imposed by the superintendent, after a full hearing, is not shocking to any sense of fairness, and should not have been overturned by the court below (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, esp 235-236).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Antonucci v. Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1977
366 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Antonucci v. Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUDOLPH G. ANTONUCCI, Respondent, v. PORT CHESTER-RYE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 9, 1977

Citations

366 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1977)
366 N.E.2d 871
397 N.Y.S.2d 783

Citing Cases

Quinn v. Nadler Bros., Inc., City of Amsterdam

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2…

Matter of Barone v. City of Dunkirk

Daniel R. Polowy for respondents. Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (…