From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Anderson v. Metro Decorating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 1957
4 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

October 19, 1957

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Gibson, JJ.


An employer and its carrier appeal from an award and decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board which directed payment of $500 to the chairman of the Workmen's Compensation Board for the benefit of the Vocational Rehabilitation Fund, under subdivision 9 of section 15 of the statute; and $1,500 to the Special Fund under subdivision 3 of section 25-a of the statute. Decedent died as the result of an industrial accident. He was survived by a widow who received an award for funeral expenses and $21 a week for death benefits. She instituted a third-party action, and pending the outcome of that action she received advance payments of compensation in the sum of $3,109, which included $400 for funeral expenses. The third-party action was settled before trial for $17,000 without the consent of the carrier, although the carrier was consulted prior to the actual settlement and consented to waive payment of $2,000 of its lien against the widow's recovery, and later accepted the sum of $1,109 in settlement of its lien for advances of compensation. Since the carrier did not consent to the settlement there is no doubt that it could have enforced its lien for the full amount of $3,109 against the recovery (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 29) but it chose to waive $2,000 thereof. While it did not consent to the settlement it was evidently willing to reduce its lien because its representatives thought the widow's case was doubtful and a part of a loaf was better than the prospect of nothing. By failing to obtain the consent of the carrier the widow lost her right to any possible deficiency compensation or death benefits. The somewhat equivocal procedure of the carrier left it in no position to avoid payments into the special funds as aforesaid since there were no persons left who were entitled to benefits ( Matter of Department of Taxation Finance v. Thompson-Starrett Co., 271 App. Div. 906). Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Anderson v. Metro Decorating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 1957
4 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Matter of Anderson v. Metro Decorating Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARIA ANDERSON, Respondent, against METRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Capitelli v. Wells, Rich

Here, although decedent died leaving two dependents who in fact received over $14,000 in benefits, the…

Claim of Murray v. Farmingdale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Of course the carrier benefited very substantially by the third-party action and by the settlement, and the…