From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1918
120 N.E. 55 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1918

Decided June 4, 1918

Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.

Bertrand L. Pettigrew and W.L. Glenney for respondents.


The claimant, at the time he was injured, was a longshoreman in the employ of the Johnson Lighterage Company, which had a contract to load a vessel in navigable waters. While thus engaged he sustained an injury by slipping on a pier from which the cargo was being taken. He made a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Law and the industrial commission allowed the same. Its award was reversed by the Appellate Division, the claim dismissed, and the commission appeals to this court.

In my opinion, for the reasons stated by me in Matter of Doey v. Howland Co., Inc., decided herewith, Anderson, at the time he was injured, was engaged in performing a maritime contract. The industrial commission, therefore, had no jurisdiction to make the award; it was properly vacated by the Appellate Division, and the claim dismissed.

The order of the Appellate Division, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs against the state industrial commission.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE and COLLIN, JJ., concur; CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ., dissent.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1918
120 N.E. 55 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Matter of Anderson v. Johnson Lighterage Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LOUIS ANDERSON against JOHNSON LIGHTERAGE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1918

Citations

120 N.E. 55 (N.Y. 1918)
120 N.E. 55

Citing Cases

Industrial Comm. v. Nordenholt Co.

An injury on a dock, pier or wharf is not a maritime injury and, therefore, not within the admiralty law. If…

Zampiere v. Spencer Son Corporation

" Claimant's employer gave the nature of his business, in part, as stevedoring; claimant was engaged in that…