From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Abbondandolo v. Lishansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1991
174 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents, appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appeal from the order is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument. The petitioner offered no new evidence warranting treatment of the motion as one in the nature of renewal.

As a probationary employee of the City of Glen Cove Police Department, the petitioner was assigned to train at the Nassau County Police Academy, and could be dismissed from the Academy at any time, without a hearing and without specific reasons being stated. In the absence of bad faith or reasons prohibited by law, such a determination will be upheld (see, Matter of Leon v Meehan, 67 N.Y.2d 613; Matter of LaMotta v New York City Tr. Auth., 165 A.D.2d 875). "The burden of presenting legal and competent evidence to show a deprivation of petitioner's rights or bad faith or other arbitrary action constituting abuse of * * * discretion must be borne by petitioner" (Haberman v Codd, 48 A.D.2d 505, 508). Here, the petitioner has failed to sustain his burden. Furthermore, the petitioner was not an employee of Nassau County, but of the City of Glen Cove Police Department. Any obligation owed the petitioner by the Nassau County Police Academy can only arise from the Academy's agreement with the City of Glen Cove Police Department to train its officers. Certainly, the Academy's obligation to the petitioner can be no more than that of the petitioner's employer.

We have examined the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Kooper, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Abbondandolo v. Lishansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1991
174 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Abbondandolo v. Lishansky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUSSELL ABBONDANDOLO, Appellant, v. DANIEL LISHANSKY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
571 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

McAdam v. Suffolk Cnty. Police Dep't

In reaching the conclusion that the Plaintiff's dismissal was not arbitrary or capricious, Justice Pitts…

Matter of Gov. Employees Ins. v. Abbensett

d endorsement of Abbensett's policy ( see, Continental Ins. Co. v. Reilly, 143 A.D.2d 64). Furthermore, under…