From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Abadinsky v. Abadinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 23, 1999.

Appeal from the Family Court, Richmond County (Richardson, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the sixth decretal paragraph thereof; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Richmond County, for a hearing to establish a visitation schedule.

The record provides a sound and substantial basis for the determination of the Family Court to grant custody of the parties' child to the mother, and permit the mother to relocate to Florida with the child ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167). Although both parties appear to be capable and loving parents, we find that it is in the best interests of the child for the mother to have sole custody and to relocate to Florida ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, supra; Matter of Tropea v. Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727).

However, under the circumstances of this case, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Richmond County, for a hearing to establish a visitation schedule.

Joy, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Abadinsky v. Abadinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Abadinsky v. Abadinsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF SCOTT K. ABADINSKY, Appellant, v. DONNA L. ABADINSKY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 23, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 476 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

Miller v. Pipia

The factors to be considered "include, but are certainly not limited to each parent's reasons for seeking or…

In the Matter of Reilly v. Schmidt

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. When reviewing a custodial parent's…