From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

226 East 13th St. Limited Partnership v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1995
215 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.).


Respondent acted irrationally in denying petitioner's application for a major capital improvement rent increase on the ground petitioner failed to file registration statements for 1987 and 1988. Such failure to file in timely fashion is immaterial. Petitioner had filed the initial 1984 registration and the 1986 annual registration, and the 1987 and 1988 registrations were not due at the time the application was filed. We also note that the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City of NY § 26-517 [e]) provides for the prospective elimination of sanctions for failure to timely file registration statements.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

226 East 13th St. Limited Partnership v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 23, 1995
215 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

226 East 13th St. Limited Partnership v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of 226 EAST 13TH ST. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Respondent, v. NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 23, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

87th St. Realty v. Mulholland

Petitioner's failure to file a current registration statement does not, as a matter of law, preclude…