From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter Nationwide Ins v. Ward

Supreme Court, Monroe County
May 5, 1982
113 Misc. 2d 867 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)

Opinion

May 5, 1982

Sullivan, Gough, Skipworth, Summers Smith ( Thomas E. Lenweaver of counsel), for petitioner.

Chelli Bush, P.C. ( Robert D. Bush of counsel), for respondent.


This application is brought by petitioner pursuant to CPLR 7503 and 2201 PLR to stay arbitration requested by respondent under the New York Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law, art 18).

On May 28, 1979, James Ward died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident involving petitioner's insured and another. Respondent administratrix seeks arbitration of her claim for three years of Mr. Ward's loss of earnings. She contends that this is an item of "basic economic loss" to which she is entitled pursuant to section 671 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Insurance Law and that she has the option to arbitrate this dispute pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 675 Ins. of the Insurance Law. Petitioner notes that respondent has commenced an action at law for wrongful death and maintains that loss of earnings incurred on account of death is not an element of "basic economic loss".

Subdivision 1 of section 671 Ins. of the Insurance Law contains the following definitions:

"'Basic economic loss' means * * *

"(b) loss of earnings from work which the injured person would have performed had he not been injured, and reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by such person in obtaining services in lieu of those that he would have performed for income, up to one thousand dollars per month for not more than three years from the date of the accident causing the injury * * *

"'Basic economic loss' shall not include any loss incurred on account of death".

The clear language of this statute expressly excludes loss of earnings on account of death. Although section 675 Ins. of the Insurance Law sets forth broad authority to submit disputes over payment of first-party benefits to arbitration, this court holds as a matter of law that respondent's claim has been excepted from the applicable statute and that there is no dispute to be arbitrated.

Accordingly, petitioner's application is granted and the arbitration requested by respondent is stayed.


Summaries of

Matter Nationwide Ins v. Ward

Supreme Court, Monroe County
May 5, 1982
113 Misc. 2d 867 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)
Case details for

Matter Nationwide Ins v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JOAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Monroe County

Date published: May 5, 1982

Citations

113 Misc. 2d 867 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982)
450 N.Y.S.2d 147

Citing Cases

Lazaro v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.

On the other hand, if the substantive law of New York is applicable to this action, Appellant is not entitled…