From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter, Jacobs v. Wappingers Cen. Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted September 8, 1999

November 1, 1999

Janet Axelrod, Albany, N.Y. (Paul D. Clayton of counsel), for appellant.

Shaw Perelson, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Michael K. Lambert of counsel), for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Wappingers Central School District, to file an affidavit stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bellantoni, J.), dated August 18, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the respondent to file an affidavit pursuant toRetirement and Social Security Law § 803(b)(3) stating that the petitioner is eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System.

Initially, we determine that the verification of the petition in this case was proper. Further, contrary to the Supreme Court's conclusion, the petitioner satisfied her initial burden of demonstrating that she met the requirements of Retirement and Social Security Law § 803(b)(3) (see, Matter of Scanlan v. Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 N.Y.2d 662 ; Matter of Spector v. Board of Educ., 251 A.D.2d 588 ). The respondent's vague and conclusory assertion that it was not the petitioner's first public employer was insufficient to demonstrate a rational basis for its failure to process the petitioner's application for retroactive membership in the retirement system. Since the dates of the petitioner's employment with the respondent are not disputed, the determination of her date of membership will be made by the public retirement system (see, Retirement and Social Security Law § 803[b], [c]).

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter, Jacobs v. Wappingers Cen. Sch. Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter, Jacobs v. Wappingers Cen. Sch. Dist

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HARRIET JACOBS, appellant, v. WAPPINGERS CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 215 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Thompson v. The State Office of Court Admin.

fail to demonstrate a rational basis for barring petitioner from the courthouse and requiring her to…