From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matrix Essentials v. Cosmetic Gallery

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 4, 1996
85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir. 1996)

Summary

holding that the presence of internal grievance procedures meant the destruction of plaintiff’s paintings and pictures by corrections officers did not amount to a due process claim

Summary of this case from Wongus v. Corr. Emergency Response Team

Opinion

Nos. 95-5012, 95-5057.

April 4, 1996.

Appeal from the D.N.J., 870 F.Supp. 1237.


AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Matrix Essentials v. Cosmetic Gallery

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 4, 1996
85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir. 1996)

holding that the presence of internal grievance procedures meant the destruction of plaintiff’s paintings and pictures by corrections officers did not amount to a due process claim

Summary of this case from Wongus v. Corr. Emergency Response Team

holding that an inmate filing a grievance with prison officials engages in activity protected by the First Amendment

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Peters
Case details for

Matrix Essentials v. Cosmetic Gallery

Case Details

Full title:Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Cosmetic Gallery, Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 1996

Citations

85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Wongus v. Corr. Emergency Response Team

The destruction of paintings and pictures and the theft of a photograph do not violate due process where…

Wilson v. Shannon

Def. Mot. Ex. 1, 17-19, 35-36; Pl. Resp. Exs. 8B, 9. It is well-settled that prison officials cannot take…