From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathews v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 17, 1925
21 Ala. App. 173 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

4 Div. 186.

November 17, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dale County; J. S. Williams. Judge.

Beab Mathews was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Sollie Sollie, of Ozark, for appellant.

Proof of a former conviction was erroneously admitted. Stewart v. State, 18 Ala. App. 92, 89 So. 391; Finderson v. State, ante p. 109, 105 So. 399; Shields v. State, 20 Ala. App. 639, 104 So. 685; Pippin v. State, 197 Ala. 613, 73 So. 340; Lakey v. State, 206 Ala. 180, 89 So. 605, 18 A.L.R. 706; Lyles v. State, 18 Ala. App. 62, 88 So. 375.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The judgment in this case must be reversed for two reasons:

(1) The state was permitted over the objection of defendant to introduce the record of a prior conviction of defendant for a similar offense. This under numerous decisions constitutes reversible error. Lyles v. State, 18 Ala. App. 62, 88 So. 375; Bertalsen v. State, 20 Ala. App. 539, 103 So. 480.

(2) The state was permitted, over the objection and exception of defendant, to prove that defendant said, in the presence of Beck and another officer, after the arrest had been made, and while defendant was in custody: "He would plead guilty if they wouldn't put no sentence on him." This was not an admission of guilt, or a confession, and should not have been admitted.

For the errors pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Mathews v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 17, 1925
21 Ala. App. 173 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Mathews v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATHEWS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 17, 1925

Citations

21 Ala. App. 173 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
106 So. 206

Citing Cases

Wallace v. State

R. B. Patton, of Athens, for appellant. The statements attributed to the defendant after being apprehended…

Lindsey v. State

Statements of the kind testified to by witness Hammock do not constitute confessions or admissions, and…