reversing summary judgment in favor of distributor, and finding no business justification for failing to accept higher bid of plaintiff and thus inference of antitrust conduct sufficient to create question of fact
Summary of this case from W. Boylston Cinema v. Paramount, NoNo. 90-1423.
June 24, 1991, October TERM, 1990.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 917 F. 2d 1391.
reversing summary judgment in favor of distributor, and finding no business justification for failing to accept higher bid of plaintiff and thus inference of antitrust conduct sufficient to create question of fact
Summary of this case from W. Boylston Cinema v. Paramount, Nostating that federal law preempts state law "where there is implicit in federal law a barrier to state regulation . . . or where the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full objectives of Congress"
Summary of this case from Verizon New England, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionFull title:MASSILLON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. FARBER
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 24, 1991
Questions of Law or Fact Common to Members of the Class Predominate Over Any Questions Affecting Only…
W. Boylston Cinema v. Paramount, NoThis court observes, however, that, but for West Boylston's inability to show diversity of entities in…