From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maryland Realty Corporation v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 7, 1916
98 A. 1083 (Md. 1916)

Opinion

Decided April 7th, 1916.

Wills: construction; devises over, should any legatee not be in esse.

A testator by his will devised two-thirds of his property to his three children, share and share alike; and then provided that if any of them "should die without having married or leaving children, his or her share to be divided among the surviving children, the heirs, however, of any of the three children who might have died previously to be entitled to their parents' share": Held, that:

This latter provision was not in derogation of the absolute estate that had been already devised, but was simply a devise over in case any of the legatees should not be in esse to take when the will became operative.

Decided April 7th, 1916.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (HEUISLER, J.)

The cause was submitted to BOYD, C.J., BRISCOE, BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE and CONSTABLE, JJ.

Harry E. Karr and D. List Warner, filed a brief for the appellant.

Edwin W. Wells, filed a brief for the appellee.


Summaries of

Maryland Realty Corporation v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 7, 1916
98 A. 1083 (Md. 1916)
Case details for

Maryland Realty Corporation v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:THE MARYLAND REALTY CORPORATION, INCORPORATED, vs . JOSEPH B. MITCHELL

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 7, 1916

Citations

98 A. 1083 (Md. 1916)
128 Md. 698

Citing Cases

Pyne v. Pyne

Clagett v. Bowie, supra, note 6. Duering v. Brill, 1915, 127 Md. 104, 96 A. 269; Lumpkin v. Lumpkin, 1908,…

Clagett v. Bowie

There are cases in which limitations over in the event of the death of the first devisee without leaving…