From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 8, 1963
321 F.2d 70 (5th Cir. 1963)

Summary

upholding jury verdict that was reached after fourteen minutes of deliberation

Summary of this case from Sheedy v. BSB Props., LC

Opinion

No. 19857.

August 8, 1963.

Arthur Cobb, Cobb Brewer, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.

Edward W. Gray, of Percy, Macmurdo Gray, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee.

Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.


The plaintiff, Mrs. Mary R. Marx, sued the insurer of Our Lady of the Lake Hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for false imprisonment, embarrassment, assault, battery, and unlawful restraint. While a guest parliamentarian at a meeting of the Louisiana Nurses Association in a Baton Rouge hotel, Mrs. Marx suffered a stroke. The nurses rushed her to a hospital and summoned a physician to treat her. Mrs. Marx was confused and semi-conscious for at least five or six days. She remained at the hospital eleven days. The record shows that during her hospitalization her husband saw her frequently. He concurred in her continued hospitalization, and on at least one occasion told the attending physician to do whatever was necessary for the plaintiff. Doctors and nurses testified that during the entire time she was in the hospital her behaviour indicated that her mental processes were so impaired that she was unable to think rationally. She suffered delusions of persecution.

After deliberating fourteen minutes, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. This appeal is based solely on the ground that the evidence does not support the verdict: the short deliberate period of fourteen minutes is proof in itself, so appellant argues, that the jury did not properly consider the case and could not have arrived at a reasoned conclusion. There is no merit to the appellant's argument. We cannot hold an hour-glass over a jury. If the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, the length of time the jury deliberates is immaterial. Here the evidence amply supports the verdict. Some of us might not have required fourteen minutes to reach the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 8, 1963
321 F.2d 70 (5th Cir. 1963)

upholding jury verdict that was reached after fourteen minutes of deliberation

Summary of this case from Sheedy v. BSB Props., LC

upholding verdict where jury deliberated for only fourteen minutes

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Shkolir

discussing the relevance of a brief jury deliberation

Summary of this case from Hainey v. Phelps
Case details for

Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

Case Details

Full title:Mary Robertson MARX, Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 1963

Citations

321 F.2d 70 (5th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Wilburn v. Eastman Kodak Company

Brief deliberation, by itself, does not show that the jury failed to give full, conscientious or impartial…

Whelan v. Teledyne Metalworking Products

As pointed out in the case cited by Plaintiff, the briefness of deliberations alone is an insufficient basis…