From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Wynder

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 20, 2010
CIVIL ACTION, No. 08-0046 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION, No. 08-0046.

January 20, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of James Martinez's Amended Rule 60(b) Motion, the response thereto, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski dated November 24, 2009, and Martinez's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Martinez's objections are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; and
3. Martinez's motion for relief filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Wynder

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 20, 2010
CIVIL ACTION, No. 08-0046 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Martinez v. Wynder

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARTINEZ v. JAMES T. WYNDER, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 20, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION, No. 08-0046 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Martinez-Hernandez

A petitioner may not use Rule 60(b)(6) "as a catchall to avoid the one-year limitation [of Rule 60(c)]."…

Gray v. Kerestes

Although the one-year time limit does not explicitly apply to motions under Rule 60(b)(6), the Third Circuit…