From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61704 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61704

05-15-2013

HENRY GILBERTO MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of attempted sexual assault. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Appellant Henry Gilberto Martinez contends that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing by relying upon the evaluator's opinion in the psychosexual evaluation that he presented a high risk to re-offend. Martinez asserts that the evaluator's opinion of risk was not based on "a currently accepted standard of assessment" as required by NRS 176.139(3) and NRS 176A.110(l)(a) because it was based on his professional opinion rather than the results of the actuarial assessments. Martinez also contends that the district court erred by failing to make specific findings regarding the discrepancy between the evaluator's professional opinion and the results of some of the actuarial assessments.

NRS 176A.110 and NRS 176.139 do not require evaluators to rely solely on actuarial assessments in conducting psychosexual evaluations; an evaluator may also rely on his or her professional opinion. Blackburn v. State, 129 Nev. _____, _____, 294 P.3d 422, 426 (2013). Further, although the district court failed to make specific findings regarding the discrepancy between the evaluator's professional opinion and the results of some of the actuarial assessments, the record supports the district court's implicit conclusion that the evaluator's opinion was based on "currently accepted standards of assessment." NRS 176A.110(l)(a); see Blackburn, 129 Nev. at _____, 294 P.3d at 426-27. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see id. at _____, 294 P.3d at 427, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

_______________, J.

Gibbons

_______________, J.
Douglas
_______________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge

Washoe County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Martinez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61704 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Martinez v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY GILBERTO MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

No. 61704 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)